Abel Forger vs Stijn Pel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Jun at 05:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Forger vs S. Pel

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Forger 1 - 0 Pel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Abel Forger winning 2 and Stijn Pel winning 0. The last match between Abel Forger and Stijn Pel was at the M15 Alkmaar, 25-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Abel Forger getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Forger | 1 |
Pel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Alkmaar(06-25-25)
A. Forger vs S. Pel H2H Profile
A. Forger vs S. Pel Match Preview:
- Forger has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, winning 43.43% of points compared to Pel's 42.94%.
- Who excels at returning their opponent's second serve? Forger wins 50.81% of these points, outperforming Pel's 43.86%.
- In first serve returns, Pel has the advantage with a 32.52% win rate over Forger's 27.63%.
- When saving breakpoints, Pel slightly leads, saving 53.49% compared with Forger's 53.06%.
- Overall, Forger has a higher win rate over the past year at 63.24%, compared to Pel's 58.62%.
- Forger's strongest surface is hard court with a 63% win rate, while Pel fares better on clay at 58%.
- Both players have been competing primarily at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Forger winning a higher percentage of matches.
- Forger has faced opponents with an average rank of 435.65, while Pel's opponents average at 245.55, indicating Pel's tougher competition.
- Pel shows a stronger performance in deciding sets, winning 57% versus Forger's 48%.
- How do the players fare in converting breakpoint opportunities? Pel leads with a 40.74% conversion rate compared to Forger's 34.44%.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the head-to-head stats, both players have their distinct strengths. Forger slightly surpasses Pel in recent second serve performance and has a higher overall win rate in the past year, suggesting a form advantage.
However, Pel's proficiency in converting break points and her ability to win deciding sets provide a strong competitive edge, particularly in high-pressure situations.
Although Forger has performed better on hard courts, the context of Pel's matches against stronger opponents over the past year could indicate greater resilience and adaptation in challenging scenarios.
Ultimately, considering Pel's advantages in break point conversion, first serve return efficiency, and success in deciding sets, Pel is likely favored to win this match. The competitive edge rests on her ability to capitalize on key opportunities during the game.
Abel Forger vs Stijn Pel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Forger vs S. Pel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
10 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:10:0 | Average Match Time | 2:10:0 |
51% (38/75) | 1st Serve % | 52% (48/92) |
74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (32/48) |
41% (15/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (17/44) |
36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
47% (43/92) | Return Points Win % | 43% (32/75) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Forger Recent Matches Played
S. Pel Recent Matches Played

A. Forger vs S. Pel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54.46% (61/51) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.06% (78/69) |
54.12% (138/117) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.89% (174/155) |
53.74% (1272/1095) | Games Win/Loss | 50.46% (1591/1562) |
62.50% (30/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.85% (28/24) |
47.37% (27/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.25% (41/36) |
57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
293 | Aces Total | 315 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
433 | Total Double Faults | 253 |
1:38:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
426.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 245.63 |
62% (4220/6811) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3625/5983) |
67% (2833/4220) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2422/3625) |
46% (1201/2591) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1162/2358) |
44% (341/771) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (209/564) |
42% (2884/6787) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2228/5965) |
0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
54.95% (61/50) | Futures W/L | 53.06% (78/69) |
54% (59/109) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (77/145) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (12/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (20/38) |
45% (15/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (18/37) |
87% (61/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (81/69) |
13% (61/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (81/12) |
14% (50/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (66/9) |